<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Marla Bobowick &#8211; Insights With Impact</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insightswithimpact.org/author/marla-bobowick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insightswithimpact.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 15:53:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.6.17</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Executive Committees: 4 tips for balancing efficiency with board engagement</title>
		<link>http://insightswithimpact.org/2019/08/12/executive-committees-4-tips-for-balancing-efficiency-with-board-engagement/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=executive-committees-4-tips-for-balancing-efficiency-with-board-engagement</link>
					<comments>http://insightswithimpact.org/2019/08/12/executive-committees-4-tips-for-balancing-efficiency-with-board-engagement/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marla Bobowick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2019 06:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Boards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leadership]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insightswithimpact.org/?p=1396</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As a consultant, I’m not a big fan of executive committees. As a board chair, I appreciate how they can help the board and CEO. I try to be vigilant about our executive committee. Surprised to find this blog about rumors helpful (How rumors undermine staff trust—and 6 ways to quell them), I’ve recast the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img loading="lazy" class="alignnone wp-image-1400" src="http://insightswithimpact.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Executive-Directors-1024x441-300x129.jpg" alt="" width="795" height="342" srcset="http://insightswithimpact.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Executive-Directors-1024x441-300x129.jpg 300w, http://insightswithimpact.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Executive-Directors-1024x441-768x331.jpg 768w, http://insightswithimpact.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Executive-Directors-1024x441.jpg 1024w" sizes="(max-width: 795px) 100vw, 795px" />As a consultant, I’m <u>not a big fan of executive committees</u>. As a board chair, I appreciate how they can help the board and CEO. I try to be vigilant about our executive committee. Surprised to find this blog about rumors helpful (<a href="https://www.ragan.com/how-rumors-undermine-staff-trust-and-6-ways-to-quell-them/">How rumors undermine staff trust—and 6 ways to quell them</a>), I’ve <u>recast the recommendations for nonprofit boards and CEOs</u>.</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Document, distribute, and demystify. </strong>Avoid the “DK DK” dilemma of board members who <u>don’t know what they don’t know</u>. Document executive committee meetings and <u>distribute the minutes</u> to the full board. This <u>helps shed light</u> on what goes on at executive committee meetings.</li>
<li><strong>Examine underlying practices and procedures.</strong> Some executive committees operate as the <u>last stop before the board.</u> All reports and recommendations must first be approved by the executive committee. In practice, this <u>converts the rest of the board into a rubber stamp</u>. <strong>Avoid this</strong>.  Other executive committees serve as the first stop for exploring issues with the CEO. These executive committees serve as a <u>kitchen cabinet where the CEO can think out loud</u> in the early stages of an idea. They share perspectives, ask questions, and suggest additional resources but do not make decisions. <u>Try this instead</u>.</li>
<li><strong>Provide access. </strong>All board members should have <u>access to the same information</u>. Not all reports distributed to the executive committee need to be distributed to the full board. But, <u>if any board members ask for that information</u>, they should be briefed on the issues and <u>provided appropriate reports without hesitation</u>.</li>
<li><strong>Ask, assess, and act differently. </strong>Executive committee members are often blind to the perceptions of other board members. <u>Seek input from the rest of the board</u>. At the end of a board meeting, have an <u>AMA (ask me anything) discussion in executive session</u>. For more anonymity, <u>conduct a board self-assessment</u>. A well-done online survey will surface any issues that may exist about communication between the board and executive committee. The key to success is not in the asking but in <u>using the feedback to do things differently</u>.</li>
</ol>
<p>Being board chair hasn’t changed my concerns about executive committees, but it has made me <u>more aware of the importance of <em>good governance</em> relations</u> between and among the board and CEO. As I think about passing the baton to the next chair and executive committee, I <u>plan to test these tips at my farewell meeting</u> by asking the full board how well I lived up to my own recommendations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>http://insightswithimpact.org/2019/08/12/executive-committees-4-tips-for-balancing-efficiency-with-board-engagement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
